
Then Bill at Integral Options Cafe, posts this series of relationship articles and commentary here. Then ebuddha responds again with what I view as a trap: we create a box to put our definitions in, and then use the limitations of that self-created box to prove our point.
"If" we assume this, and then we assume this, then this must be true. How do you define a successfull relationship? Duration? Is that the primary measurement?
Perhaps an integral approach to relationship first is part of a new approach that will constitute a new definition of a successful relationship from a higher perspective. Again, I love this conversation. Not that many people seem to be having it.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Some readers are posting irresponsibly as anonymous. If you are going to comment, you should be willing to stand behind your comments and your convictions. Anyone who comments anonymously runs the risk of having your comment removed.